Ilya Goldberg wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008, at 6:42 PM, fulatoro wrote:
>
>> Well, you might have a point, however, I am reading IO pins and I
>> would like to have better granularity than the 10ms System clock, I
>> realize that I can probably improve things by writing a device driver
>> and doing the work in the kernel, but the complexity is not justified.
>> My system is doing basic IO work and provides a web interface for
>> setup and configuration and that is about it. It should not be too
>> taxing.
>
> Everybody says that it'll bring the CPU to its knees, but I always
> thought that sounded a little fishy. There is time to execute
> 200,000 instructions at 1kHz, which seems like plenty.
>
> If you do reset the system clock to a kHz or so, I'd be curious to
> hear how things go for you.
> Oh, and what board are you using?
> Thanks,
> -Ilya
>
>
Since it's a user application we're talking about why switch to the
kernel 10 times more? And especially for applications which read from
the IO pins and may need fast responses to events.
Fotis
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|