On 16-jan-2007, at 22:43, Eddie Dawydiuk wrote: > Is there any sort of formal statement from TS on when the 2.6 kernel > series will be supported?
TS doesn't have a formal statement regarding support of the 2.6 kernel.
[motivation deleted]
Ok, fair enough. So far so good from my end; the stuff I want to hookup simply works, it's just that you may run into something you really need that only works (well) in 2.6.x kernels. Hopefully that won't be the case.
It'll probably be a matter of time I suppose.
We'd really rather invest energy in making Linux more transparent in customer applications
Well, I don't know... I kinda like a commandline. But I get the point. I was actually talking to someone about this. He's fairly familiar with lowlevel electronics stuff so he's currently playing with an Arduino board, quite lowlevel yet it comes with an IDE so he can program the thing without being bothered with all the stuff you need to know to run linux, or write software for it. He told me he'd really love to use ts boards instead because of the flexibility but he's reluctant to climb the linux learning cure.
I have to explain why they have to use "root=/dev/hda1" in one place and "/dev/ide0/bus0/target0/part1"
Yeah, why is that anyway? Isn't it all the same thing but written in multiple complicated ways? Confusing stuff.
;)
__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
__,_._,___
|