:-)
Obviously I felt kind of stupid when Michael explained that the
numbering started at 0, which I did't even consider when writing my
second mail.
And as always, someone have to rub it in... :-)
I saw the smiley but i just have to explain myself. (Thus violating the
rule "If standing in shit without boots, for gods sake: stand still!)
I thought i remembered seeing /dev/mtdblock/1-3 and I know that for
harddrives numbers are >=1 (as in hda1).
Instead of assuming that i remembered wrong I assumed that "Hey, they
must have reordered the partitions. I wonder why....". Reordering the
partitions would NOT have been natural.
Classic case of write before you think so to say.
Jim Jackson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Per Öberg wrote:
>
>> ........ It would be natural to assume that the partition named
>> "TS-BOOTROM" was /dev/mtdblock/1 and "Linux" mtdblock/2 while Reedboot
>> is /dev/mtdblock/3 but that does not seem to be the case.
>
> Define "natural" :-)
>
> You will find many things are numbered from "0". If you do much C
> programming this becomes "natural"
>
>
--
Per Öberg, Ph.D. Student
Address: Division of Vehicular Systems
Department of Electrical Engineering
Linköpings universitet
581 83 Linköping, SWEDEN
Phone: +46 (0)13-28 23 69
e-mail:
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|