Hi.
David WennstrÃm kirjoitti:
> Yes, one of my objectives is to make it cheap and by using "normal" webcams.
> The real task is done - I have built a 6DOF sensor and it works, but (!) I
> want to make it faster. And these 80 ms are really nagging me.
>
Yes, it is a long time. BTW: If you do head tracking you can often get
away with 5DOF tracking, since you are probably only interested in the
two eyes.
> I am also very interested in links and projects that I can read about 3D
> tracking system like this in general and particularly head tracking.
>
Here is link to one (that I wrote). I think most would be hidden in all
kinds of SW systems.
http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceedings/&toc=comp/proceedings/vr/2006/0224/00/0224toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/VR.2006.139
We used Apple iSight cameras which were certainly cheap enough (but you
cannot lock the white balance...)
The unibrain board cameras would be very cheap, but then you are down to
30 fps again...
--
====================================================
Tommi Ilmonen
Tel: +358-50-3841 543
Ubiquitous Interaction Research Group
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology
http://www.hiit.fi/ubiquitousinteraction/
====================================================
_______________________________________________
pwc mailing list
http://lists.saillard.org/mailman/listinfo/pwc
|