| To: | Lonni J Friedman <> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pwc] pwc broken in 2.6.18-1.2849.fc6 ? |
| From: | Peter Baitz <> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:13:31 -0800 (PST) |
--- Lonni J Friedman <> wrote: > Sorry, I meant that I'm using the pwc that ships > with 2.6.18 (from > FC6). That version advertises itself to be 10.0.12. Lonni, I personally don't trust the capabilities in the 10.0.12 that ships with FC6. If I were you I'd grab the latest snapshot from Saillard.org and run and compile and install it. I did this with mine (though I have not yet applied the kernel update you mentioned). There was a difinite difference for me in support of the ToUcam Pro III (SPC900NC). Peter ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $510k for $1,698/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre _______________________________________________ pwc mailing list http://lists.saillard.org/mailman/listinfo/pwc |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pwc] [SPC 900NC]: maximum framerate?, Luc Saillard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [pwc] semi-OT - cam recommendation?, Steve Jensen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pwc] pwc broken in 2.6.18-1.2849.fc6 ?, Lonni J Friedman |
| Next by Thread: | [pwc] semi-OT - cam recommendation?, Steve Jensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Disclaimer: Neither Andrew Taylor nor the University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering take any responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU