naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sound Traps for Wolverines

Subject: Re: Sound Traps for Wolverines
From: naturalcontemplative
Date: Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:43 pm ((PST))
Hi Jon



You can't beat the price of the audiomoth, or the portability. But you can =
beat the audio if you have the budget. The openacousticdevices website comp=
ares the audiomoth to the Wildlife Acoustics SM2 (a discontinued but widely=
 familiar model of the Song Meter) and states that the SNR of the audiomoth=
 is about 5 dB lower than the SM2. And the SM2 is not a quiet recorder.



I have extensively used the SM4, which costs a lot more than an audiomoth b=
ut has very good audio quality. It uses EM172 mic capsules (probably becaus=
e of all of the talk about them on this group I am guessing) and it is very=
 robust in terms of weatherproofing. I can't compare the SM4 directly to th=
e audiomoth, but I have compared it to the SM3, and the SNR of the SM4 is a=
bout 10 dB better than the SM3, which in turn is supposed to be about 6 dB =
better than the SM2. I can't vouch for this, but the self noise of the audi=
omoth may be around 21 dB louder than the SM4.



The SM4 could be even better if it had slightly quieter preamps. Compared t=
o my LS-11 connected to external EM172 capsules in a PBBA, the SM4 is a lit=
tle noisier, about 1dB. The SM4 is indistinguishable from the EM172 array g=
oing into an LS-7, which has slightly noisier preamps than the LS-11



I am considering audiomoths for deployment of multiple units in an area, wh=
ere audio quality is not an issue, but I would not expect a US$79 recorder =
to deliver the same audio quality as a US$850 recorder.



Just my sense of the situation, without having actually used an audiomoth. =
Cornell Ornithology also makes a recorder called the Swift. But I have not =
been able to figure out where it sits in terms of audio quality. It costs m=
ore than an audiomoth but a lot less than an SM4.



John Crockett







"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU