naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ne recorders and visually impaired recordists!

Subject: Re: Ne recorders and visually impaired recordists!
From: "Flawn Williams" flawn1951
Date: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:08 pm ((PST))
Arnthor,

I agree with you that the move to menu-driven controls is making operation =
by visually impaired recordists harder.

One person that you might want to get in contact with is Mr. Greg Lukens at=
 Washington Professional Systems in Wheaton, MD. Greg is blind, but he is a=
lso one of the most knowledgeable people I know when it comes to audio syst=
ems, from simple to quite complex. He=92s got some of the best ears in the =
business as well. He does audio mixing for some major live PBS TV specials =
in addition to his sales acumen through his WPS business.

He=92s not a field recordist, he=92s much more of a studio and remote perfo=
rmance guy. But when I visited his home studio earlier this year, he was qu=
ite adroit in his control of a PC-based DAW system. So he might have some k=
nowledge of what tools may be lurking out there to assist accessibility.

And if it can be done on a PC, then there may be ways to port some of that =
to a Raspberry Pi or other processor to get a better-controlled portable op=
tion.

You should be able to contact him through Washington Professional Systems, =
but if you prefer I can forward your message to him and see if he wants to =
respond to you directly or through me to this list.

=97Flawn Williams

> On Nov 22, 2017, at 8:34 PM,  wrote:
>
> 1a. Ne recorders and visually impaired recordists!
>    Posted by: "Arn=FE=F3r Helgason"  <ar=
>
>    Date: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:48 am ((PST))
>
> Dear all.
>
> Please take a few minutes to read this message.
>
>
> I have to say that after having looked through the variety of portable
> sound recorders, recently on the market, I get more and more worried.
> It seams as the modern technical trend is meant to serve the benefits of=

> some people but not all.
> It is already a known fact thas some visually impaired or blind people
> are excellent recordists. Recently some, if not all recent models of
> sound recorders have touch screens instead of tactile (raised) buttons.
> An other fact is the menu system. Through the menus all kinds of things
> can be controlled - the type o files, frequency settings, file
> structure, formatting etc. Most of these things are unreachable by blind=

> persons.
> Some producers (in fact I only know about 2) have installed speech into
> some of the menu systems but not the whole systems. Olympus and Sound
> Devices can be mentioned in this case, but the systems with the speech
> only give limited access to the information.
>
> In 2007 I bought a Nagra Ares BB+. The reason was the structure o the
> menu system which made it almost possible for me to keep control of most=

> of the settings needed for the most frequent setups. When I complained
> about the silent menu system I was told that Steavy wonder could cobe
> with it.:)
> I still favour this recorder as a high quality soundproducer.
>
> Recently I bought a Zoom H6. Some recommended an F-8, but there were too=

> many elements which were not usable for my purposes o field recordings.
>
> Now my statement is this:
>
> The American foundation of the Blind has been fighting for a better
> access of blind and visually impaired people to the world web. More and
> more people now reach the age when their sight will decrease. Some of
> them might be in our group of field recordists.
> Shouldn't they love to be able to carry on with thei recordings?
> What about the companies, producing recording equipments?
> Arn't they violating the human rights by not taking into consideration
> the needs of a ever growing group of people with reduced or no vision at=

> all?
>
> I must say that my contacts with some of the companies have been quite
> positive. Thus Zoom has made it possible for me to work with some
> settings by providing scriptly information about the necessary steps,
> even though it happened last Saturday that I did something wrong so that=

> a whole recording was an Mp3 224 kb instead of a WAV 24 bits and 48
> Hertz. Fortunately my sighted wife helped me to restore the propper
> settings.
>
> Let us join together to create a better world for all o us.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Arnthor
>
>  <>
>
>  <>
>
>
> http://hljod.blog.is <http://hljod.blog.is/>
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU