Hi Bruce,
Thanks for taking the time answer all these questions, it has certainly st=
imulated discussion and has improved my knowledge of parabolas exponentiall=
y. My sound recording journey has taken me from shotgun mics to record bush=
babies for science in Africa to many other creatures with different biophon=
ic characteristics. Now I have started using quite stereo mics for soundsca=
pe recording which I love, and I am now having trouble using my K6/ME66 and=
67 mics as their sound is so noisy an unnatural. However they serve a purp=
ose which is to make recordings that are good enough to analyse with progra=
mmes like Raven and Avisoft to measure fundamental frequency, harmonics, ca=
ll length etc. Parabolics produce great quiet recordings, to listen to and=
if you have solved the bass dip issue then it is the best of both worlds f=
or many animals frequency ranges, especially with some nice stereo landscap=
e to mix in. But if I may trouble you with a further question; if you appl=
y EQ for parabolic reco
rdings (any software suggestions here, I am familiar with Audacity and Rea=
per?) does that change the sounds qualitative properties for analysis?
Cheers
Andrew
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|