Subject: | Re: Spherical Quad Mics for Field Recording? |
---|---|
From: | inetd_conf |
Date: | Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:55 am ((PDT)) |
What you mention about the results of ambeo mics being coincident and there= fore fairly flat sounding to someone used to spaced arrays is why I'm tryin= g to come up with another solution. On the face of it an ambeo should be id= eal for what I want, but I haven't been all that impressed with the results= when I listen to them on headphones. =0D =0D I'm probably asking for trouble, trying to use sum/diff methods on what am= ounts to a spaced baffled set of microphones, but I might give it a try jus= t to see what I can get. I just figured this was going to be something that= someone had tried and discarded back in the mists of time, and that's why = I'm not finding anything about it in the literature or on Google. (I'm imag= ining Blumlein listening to a spherical quad mic and thinking, "Never mind.= I'll stick with figure-eights.")=0D =0D =0D Thanks,=0D =0D =0D Tom=0D |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Spherical Quad Mics for Field Recording?, Aaron Ximm |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Spherical Quad Mics for Field Recording?, Aaron Ximm |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Spherical Quad Mics for Field Recording?, Aaron Ximm |
Next by Thread: | Re: Spherical Quad Mics for Field Recording?, Aaron Ximm |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU