> But I assume they're either both on or both off.
I=E2=80=99m sure.
> Could it damage anything to have PIP on the channel with the attenuator? =
I forget what load a microphone normally is, but I thought it was way highe=
r than 100 ohms.
Try it. Possibly a noise increase on that channel from maximum PIP current =
being drawn, but try it. If it=E2=80=99s a problem a coupling capacitor cou=
ld be added.
-Dan
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 1 Apr 2016, at 2:52 PM, Dan Dugan <=
.com> [naturerecordists] <<naturerec=
>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Each channel has its own PIP powering.
>
> -Dan
>
>> On Mar 31, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Peter Shute <pshute=
@nuw.org.au> [naturerecordists] <<na=
>> wrote:
>>
>> Just had a thought- is it safe to use PiP now that the attenuator's buil=
t into the cable? I can't use the mic without it, but now the attenuator an=
d bat detector are on the other channel. So there's a 100 ohm resistor acro=
ss one channel. Is it a problem?
>>
>> Peter Shute
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|