naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: spectral shape vs pitch

Subject: Re: spectral shape vs pitch
From: "atl" r0t0pan
Date: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:28 pm ((PST))
I believe spectral shape would be the frequency and amplitude data over
time including all harmonics, as opposed to the idea of just a series of
fundamental pitches. The sonic "envelope" as a whole of the call.
On Jan 21, 2016 6:45 PM, "Peter Shute  [naturerecordists]"
<> wrote:

>
>
> Can someone please explain the term "spectral shape"?
>
> Peter Shute
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 
> > 
> > Sent: Thursday, 21 January 2016 7:51 AM
> > To: 
> > <>
> > Subject: [Nature Recordists] spectral shape vs pitch
> >
> >
> >
> > * Melodic recognition in songbirds
> >
> >
> >
> > Researchers report that starlings trained to recognize short tone
> sequences
> > did not recognize the same sequences when the pitches of all tones were
> > uniformly shifted from the training sequence, or when the tones were
> > played at the same pitch with an unfamiliar timbre, but that the birds
> could
> > recognize sequences that preserved the spectral shape of the tones even
> in
> > the absence of pitch.
>
>





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU