Subject: | Re: spectral shape vs pitch |
---|---|
From: | "Peter Shute" pshute2 |
Date: | Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:45 pm ((PST)) |
Can someone please explain the term "spectral shape"?=0D =0D Peter Shute=0D =0D > -----Original Message-----=0D > From: =0D > =0D > Sent: Thursday, 21 January 2016 7:51 AM=0D > To: =0D > <>=0D > Subject: [Nature Recordists] spectral shape vs pitch=0D > =0D > =0D > =0D > * Melodic recognition in songbirds=0D > =0D > =0D > =0D > Researchers report that starlings trained to recognize short tone sequenc= es=0D > did not recognize the same sequences when the pitches of all tones were= =0D > uniformly shifted from the training sequence, or when the tones were=0D > played at the same pitch with an unfamiliar timbre, but that the birds co= uld=0D > recognize sequences that preserved the spectral shape of the tones even i= n=0D > the absence of pitch.=0D |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: spectral shape vs pitch, Wagner Nogueira |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Uderwater chant - Ko Samet, lamacchiacosta |
Previous by Thread: | Re: spectral shape vs pitch, Wagner Nogueira |
Next by Thread: | Re: spectral shape vs pitch, Ray Mansell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU