I think I read somewhere that on some recorders, low sensitivity just atten=
uates the signal, so why attenuate it just to amplify again in the next sta=
ge? And on some, the high setting applies digital amplification (which you =
can do more safely yourself afterwards), while on others, no one knows what=
the controls do. I may have misinterpreted what I read, but I took it to m=
ean that you need to try various settings out for yourself.
Peter Shute
Sent from my iPad
On 13 Jun 2015, at 12:50 am, 'J. Charles Holt' <mai=
lto:> [naturerecordists] <=
ups.com<>> wrote:
I've seen some people say it's better to use high sensitivity and low gain,=
and other say low sensitivity and high gain, but never any explanation of =
when or why. Does it vary depending on equipment or situation (or both)?
- Charles
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|