naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tool for learning species calls?

Subject: Re: Tool for learning species calls?
From:
Date: Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:36 am ((PST))
For anyone interested the proper link for my website is www.birdsongidentif=
ication.com


-----Original Message-----
From:  [naturerecordists] <>
To: naturerecordists <>
Sent: Fri, Jan 23, 2015 12:26 pm
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: Tool for learning species calls?







Chris and other interested members,

You make a very good point about starting "small" and locally. I've spent t=
he last 20 years writing books on learning bird song and recording bird son=
gs, by way of illustrating my descriptions. My website www.birdsongidentifi=
cation gives a glimpse into some of it. I have already brought it to Ben's =
attention off list. I would add one thing to what you say. Phonetics and mn=
emonics (what the bird is "saying"), are not just telling us "what" the bir=
d is saying. Those who have suggested that you can't describe bird songs in=
 words, I would say, are missing this point. These tools don't have to repl=
icate our spoken language. I find them extremely helpful in the teaching an=
d the learning.

As well as representing what a bird "says", they also give us an idea of ho=
w long the song (or phrase) is, how fast or slow it is, or the emphasis on =
certain syllables, as well as other nuances of the specific song. The roost=
er does not say "COC-A-DOODLE-DOO", but it gives us a good idea of the leng=
th of the song, the general breakdown of syllables, and italics could tell =
us to emphasize the last syllable. A short description of its features woul=
d help implant this song in our memory bank.....a handle for future referen=
ce. Even if the particular representation doesn't make sense to us, we have=
 learned a lot about the song.

Too often phonetics are offered as stand alone descriptions, with little ex=
planation, and the nuances of the song are left up to us to decipher. Even =
a questionable phonetic (one that "doesn't make sense" to us) may be more i=
nformative than we realize, at first glance. That's not to say that it can'=
t be personalized, after considering what it teaches us about that particul=
ar song, if that is going to help in the learning process. Meaningful descr=
iption and explanation are every bit as important as the actual phonetic pr=
esented, if we are going to understand what the bird is "saying".

Sorry if I rambled here. I do have a special interest in this topic.

All the best,
Ernie Jardine


-----Original Message-----
From: 'Chris Harrison'  [naturerecordists] <naturerecord=
>
To: naturerecordists <>
Sent: Fri, Jan 23, 2015 9:58 am
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: Tool for learning species calls?








Ben,

The problem with learning bird calls (or insect, frog, etc) calls is that i=
t is a very personal thing.   By that, I mean that what I =E2=80=9Chear=E2=
=80=9D in a particular bird=E2=80=99s call may be very different than what =
you =E2=80=9Chear=E2=80=9D.  I have had to do this with amphibian calls for=
 various areas and realized pretty quickly that descriptions in books or on=
line that other people write just don=E2=80=99t make sense to me.  Now that=
 I am very familiar with the calls of the frogs in my area, I=E2=80=99m alw=
ays surprised by other people=E2=80=99s descriptions of them.

That said, the Peterson CD series =E2=80=9CBirding by Ear=E2=80=9D are supp=
osed to be pretty useful as a framework to get you started.  I don=E2=80=99=
t own them, but have had them recommended by other b irders.

If I wanted to set about to learn bird calls, I would start off by finding =
out what the 20 or 30 most common species in my area/yard/nearby park were.=
  A local Audubon society or ebird.org would be great sources for that info=
rmation if you don=E2=80=99t already know the local avifauna.  Then I would=
 listen to their a variety of recordings of their calls and figure out my o=
wn personal description of what they sound like.  Then test yourself by get=
ting outside.  It won=E2=80=99t take long to learn the commonest stuff.  Th=
en when you hear something you don=E2=80=99t know, you can research it, fig=
ure out what it was and add it to you known list.   Carrying a little pocke=
t recorder would be helpful here.  I think this way is the most effective w=
ay of learning calls.

A couple of very useful resources wou ld be Cornell=E2=80=99s All About Bir=
ds website (www.allaboutbirds.org) which has recordings of most species (as=
suming you are in North America ?) or the wonderful xeno-canto.org website =
with recordings from all over the world including sonograms.   The xeno-can=
to recordings are creative commons licenses so you could download them and =
make your own personal playlists to help you learn just the species that oc=
cur around you.

The real key is to personalize it.  Just because someone else tells you a b=
ird sounds like it is saying =E2=80=9CWho-cooks-for-you=E2=80=9D doesn=E2=
=80=99t help if that isn=E2=80=99t what you hear in the call.  You need to =
make up your own personal tools.

Good luck.  It is an intimidating task from the outset, but it is doable.  =
I know a lot of folks who kno w a lot of their local bird calls.

Chris Harrison
San Antonio, TX

















<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU