| Subject: | Re: old mic vs new mic, can you help? |
|---|---|
| From: | "John Crockett" naturalcontemplative |
| Date: | Thu Nov 20, 2014 6:35 pm ((PST)) |
Just to complete the connecting of dots of this helpful explanation, I believe that means the sensitivity of the ME9 is only 3.16 mV/Pa compared to 38 mV/Pa for the EM172. Thanks, Eric. On Nov 20, 2014, at 8:15 PM, Eric Benjamin [naturerecordists] wrote: > So the sensitivity of the Olympus me9 is probably -50 dBV/Pa. A > very low sensitivity by more modern standards. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: old mic vs new mic, can you help?, vickipowys |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: old mic vs new mic, can you help?, vickipowys |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: old mic vs new mic, can you help?, vickipowys |
| Next by Thread: | Re: old mic vs new mic, can you help?, vickipowys |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU