naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FYI: some recent tech that might be useful in the field

Subject: Re: FYI: some recent tech that might be useful in the field
From: "Kevin Colver" kjcolver
Date: Thu Jun 26, 2014 6:01 am ((PDT))
Bernie,
Anthropophony is a little hard to say and might not be readily understood b=
y many.

I prefer the term =93racket=94 to describe the noise.  :)

All the best to you and thank you for your great works.

Kevin Colver


On Jun 26, 2014, at 5:14 AM, Bernie Krause  [naturer=
ecordists] <> wrote:

>
> Sorry, I misspelled anthropophony, again. Corrected in the text, now.
>
> BK
>
> *********************
>
> For the past four weeks, with five more to go, I=92ve been (and will be) =
lecturing across Europe and the UK on the subject of Soundscape Ecology and=
 have picked up a few pointers, so far, along the way.
>
> First and foremost, the term, anthrophony, that Stuart Gage (Emeritus, Mi=
chigan State Univ.) and I first published after our National Park Service s=
tudy program (2001-2) was published, is not correct. We thought that the pr=
efix, anthro, meant human. But, alas, it doesn=92t. The root literally mean=
s cave, in Greek. And we ain=92t speaking about the sound of caves. The pro=
blem was called to my attention by several French colleagues in both Quimpe=
r and Paris, where I was speaking, that if we wanted to express human sound=
, then the word needs to be anthropophony. The addition of the =93po=94 in =
the middle, is essential. (Note: the term was correctly translated in the F=
rench edition of The Great Animal Orchestra).
>
> Second, a new piece of gear was called to my attention that some may have=
 already checked out. But for those who haven=92t, give the new RME: Babyfa=
ce a shot:
>
> http://www.rme-audio.de/en_products_babyface.php
>
> Bernie Krause
>
>
> On Jun 26, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Eric Benjamin  [naturereco=
rdists] <> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> You may want to ask this question in the Yahoo micbuilders group.  But m=
eanwhile I have a couple of comments and questions.
>>
>> The question is: How many microphone/transmitter systems do you need to =
make?  and how much are you prepared to pay for them?
>>
>> About 35 years ago I fabricated some microphones in support of a friend'=
s field research in the Amazon jungle.  For that I sealed the front of the =
microphone with 1/10 mil polycarbonate film, and the back of the microphone=
 with electronic type silicone rubber.  I wouldn't say that those capsules =
were waterproof, but they did survive six months in the jungle.  If I had t=
o do it today, I'd check out the waterproof capsules made by Knowles; their=
 WP series:
>> http://www.knowles.com/eng/Products/Microphones/Waterproof/WP-series
>>
>> Those capsules are typically guaranteed down to an immersion depth of 3 =
meters.  These capsules are typically in the range of $25 at Digikey and el=
sewhere.
>>
>> I'm a bit more concerned with the concept of using a radio link.  Why ca=
n't you use cable?
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, June 26, 2014 12:33 AM, " [naturerecordi=
sts]" <> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm a Ph.D. student and I need to make some long term environmental nois=
e measurements. I need to deploy a noise measurement network using small no=
des equipped with a microphone and a radio interface (for transmiting measu=
rements).
>>
>> I don't need very accurate results, but as I will have to deploy a lot o=
f measurement nodes, I need each of them to be very cheap. Electret microph=
ones such as Panasonic WM-61 are enough for my purposes. My only concern wi=
th them is that as I need to do measurements for a year or more, I need the=
 microphones to last as much as possible.
>>
>> Does anybody know (and if backed with data, better) if these microphones=
 can last when placed outdoors without breaking or suffering severe sensiti=
vity/frequency response deviations? How can I properly (and cheaply) protec=
t them? I can correct measurements with temperature data, and maybe also wi=
th humidity. Any other advices are welcome!
>>
>> Please avoid expensive commercial solutions (such as Class1/Class2 outdo=
or microphones).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> John
>>
>> PS: This topic is not 100% related to this group, as it deals with envir=
onmental noise, and not with nature sounds, but I think people in this grou=
p has for sure the experience and knowledge necessary to solve my problem, =
and the community might be interested in how to record sounds for long term=
 with cheap microphones.
>>
>> Sorry if I bother someone.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Wild Sanctuary
> POB 536
> Glen Ellen, CA 95442
> 707-996-6677
> http://www.wildsanctuary.com
> 
> SKYPE: biophony
> FaceBook:
> http://www.facebook.com/TheGreatAnimalOrchestra
> http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
> Twitter:
> http://www.twitter.com/berniekrause
> TED Global talk (12Jun13): http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voi=
ce_of_the_natural_world.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU