| Subject: | Re: Small Recorder |
|---|---|
| From: | "Martyn Stewart" mijdog2000 |
| Date: | Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:00 am ((PDT)) |
Better than a sound devices!! Considering the pre-amps on the SD are some o= f the best I have ever used this is a brave statement! When I switched over= from analog all those years ago and using my trusty nagra recorders, sound= devices blow the opposition out of the equation in my opinion. I've taken = them to the arctic, Mount Everest, the jungles of Africa, Central America a= nd never once have they let me down in performance or quality. Sure the son= y D50 is a good little recorder but to compare to the SD? Martyn Martyn Stewart WWW.naturesound.org > On Apr 13, 2014, at 7:01 PM, peter <> wrote: > > I have the D50 and love it. Sure, it doesn=E2=80=99t have XLR inputs, but= I use a Mixy field mixer and get the same quality (or better) than an SD. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Small Recorder, peter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Small Recorder, m . pesente |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Small Recorder, peter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Small Recorder, m . pesente |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU