Re: Sound Editing Software

naturerecordists

Re: Sound Editing Software

Subject:	Re: Sound Editing Software
From:	"Eric Fassbender" eric.fassbender
Date:	Thu May 30, 2013 4:20 pm ((PDT))

I'm very happy with Adobe Soundbooth.

Eric



On 31/05/2013, at 5:54 AM, Peter Shute <> wrote:

> On 31/05/2013, at 4:37 AM, "Nick Dando" <<mailt=
o:>> wrote:
>
> Alternatives are Reaper, which is cheap, and Audacity, which is free, but=
 doesn't have the ability to deal with 24/192 recordings.
>
> Is that correct? A quick Google search says it's been able to handle 192k=
Hz recordings since at least 2011. (See http://forum.audacityteam.org/viewt=
opic.php?f=3D16&t=3D61803)
>
> Peter Shute
>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Sound Editing Software, dave.burt@ymail.com Re: Sound Editing Software, Bill Whitacre Re: Sound Editing Software, Nick Dando Re: Sound Editing Software, Peter Shute Re: Sound Editing Software, Eric Fassbender <= Re: Sound Editing Software, Gianni Pavan

Previous by Date:	Re: Sound Editing Software, Peter Shute
Next by Date:	Re: Sound Editing Software, Gianni Pavan
Previous by Thread:	Re: Sound Editing Software, Peter Shute
Next by Thread:	Re: Sound Editing Software, Gianni Pavan
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU