Subject: | Re: Sound Editing Software |
---|---|
From: | "Peter Shute" pshute2 |
Date: | Thu May 30, 2013 1:24 pm ((PDT)) |
On 31/05/2013, at 4:37 AM, "Nick Dando" <<mailto:= >> wrote:=0D =0D Alternatives are Reaper, which is cheap, and Audacity, which is free, but d= oesn't have the ability to deal with 24/192 recordings.=0D =0D Is that correct? A quick Google search says it's been able to handle 192kHz= recordings since at least 2011. (See http://forum.audacityteam.org/viewtop= ic.php?f=3D16&t=3D61803)=0D =0D Peter Shute=0D |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Sound Editing Software, Nick Dando |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Sound Editing Software, Eric Fassbender |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Sound Editing Software, Nick Dando |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sound Editing Software, Eric Fassbender |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU