Subject: | Re: headphones for outdoor use: closed vs. open? |
---|---|
From: | "NormanD" nrdavies.jim71 |
Date: | Wed May 22, 2013 6:25 pm ((PDT)) |
hi, I'd suggest you open up your options wider than this short list. It's c= lear from your post that you want value for money. I strongly propose that you check out the Superlux HD681 phones. They are a tiny fraction of the cost and are likely to 'kill' the branded s= tuff you list. [ I have no affiliation with Superlux - other than the fact that I'm a very= chuffed customer of 2 varieties of what they offer ] norman. "NO6W" <> wrote: > > > AKG K240 MK II - semi-closed. > AKG K271 MK II - closed. > > The K271's cost slightly more, but other than the earpiece design they ha= ve very similar specifications. > > Looking for opinions one way or the other. > > Thanks!!! > > Glen Rickerd > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: headphones for outdoor use: closed vs. open?, Eric Fassbender |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: headphones for outdoor use: closed vs. open?, Tim Bartlett |
Previous by Thread: | Re: headphones for outdoor use: closed vs. open?, Eric Fassbender |
Next by Thread: | Re: headphones for outdoor use: closed vs. open?, Tim Bartlett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU