great test, thanks. Just for having a more complete view, I'd like to see
the same test with also pairs of low noise microphones, e.g. Rode NT1A,
Audiotechnica 4022, Sennheiser ME and MKH=85. The test well combines the
ability to judge the self-noise, the overall tonal quality, and the spatial
image.
Gianni
2013/5/21 peter <>
> Thanks for this Magnus. The non-normalized files are an interesting
> comparison.
>
> Does anyone on the group know of a similar test with stereo mics over $1=
K?
> Or have any experience themselves?
> If money was no issue at all, which (stereo) microphone would you buy?
>
> thanks
>
> Peter
>
> On 21 May 2013, at 03:04, Magnus Bergsson wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > I think those who are searching for a stereo mic under $1K for nature
> > recordings would like listen to this microphone comparison:
> > http://fieldrecording.net/2013/05/20/stereo-microphone-comparison/
> > --
> > Bestu kve=F0jur / Best regards
> > *Magn=FAs Bergsson
> > *Tel: + 354 6162904*
> > *
> > http://fieldrecording.net
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
Universit=E0 degli Studi di Pavia
Via Taramelli 24, 27100 Pavia
http://www.unipv.it/cibra
http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it
|