Thanks again, Dan!
When I saw just how thin the AT4022's where, even with the foam screens, I =
realized that the furry screens for my Rode M3's just might fit. Had them o=
ut for loan and will bring them home today, but I'm very optimistic.
Will drop you a line tonight or tomorrow about the outcome. A cheap and smo=
oth alternative if it works. Bought them for 10 GB Pounds each, and if they=
can do double duty, I'm quite happy.
/J=F6rgen
--- In Dan Dugan <> wrote:
>
> > I remember the tip for Rode deadcat, but more or less dismissed it as I=
have owned one and would have thought that the're too large for the tiny A=
T4022. Guess I was wrong.
>
> An economical way to get a layer of fur onto a mic.
>
> > How would you compare them, from "normal" to "hard" wind conditions? Bo=
th how they capture the whole sound picture, and how they keep the wind noi=
se at bay?
>
> In really windy conditions I put hi-pass filters in too. Regarding the ef=
fect of the windscreens on the sound, I don't worry about what I can't chan=
ge. Can't survive without windscreens!
>
> > The Rycote solution (with the optional fur covers) would cost me 4-5 ti=
mes as much as a pair of Rode deadcats. In your opinion; is it worth it?
>
> Start with the dead cats and upgrade later. I doubt that the aural differ=
ence is significant.
>
> -Dan
>
|