Subject: | Re: Windscreens for AT4022 |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Mon Apr 1, 2013 8:05 am ((PDT)) |
> I remember the tip for Rode deadcat, but more or less dismissed it as I h= ave owned one and would have thought that the're too large for the tiny AT4= Message: 022. Subject: Guess I was wrong. An economical way to get a layer of fur onto a mic. > How would you compare them, from "normal" to "hard" wind conditions? Both= how they capture the whole sound picture, and how they keep the wind noise= at bay? In really windy conditions I put hi-pass filters in too. Regarding the effe= ct of the windscreens on the sound, I don't worry about what I can't change= . Can't survive without windscreens! > The Rycote solution (with the optional fur covers) would cost me 4-5 time= s as much as a pair of Rode deadcats. In your opinion; is it worth it? Start with the dead cats and upgrade later. I doubt that the aural differen= ce is significant. -Dan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: So, I have lost everything..., Eric Fassbender |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Windscreens for AT4022, Jorgen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Windscreens for AT4022, Jorgen |
Next by Thread: | Re: Windscreens for AT4022, Jorgen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU