Thanks for the tips!
I wrote a reply, seems like it doesn=C2=B4t show. In case it does, sorry fo=
r the repost. I=C2=B4ve ordered some Transounds. Hope they work out. The EM=
171=C2=B4s I have yet to try. Primo ignores my questions, concerning cardio=
ids. Anyone know where to get them? The 172=C2=B4s covers most of my needs,=
and outperforms my (now sold) $1000 a pair mics. They had changeable polar=
-patterns, so now I need to fill that hole.
Smaller, cheaper, quieter, faster I guess is the new slogan.
Any more inputs are always welcome!
-Anders
--- In wrote:
>
> Here an old comparison EM172/171 clock test I made some months ago.
> https://soundcloud.com/#marco-pesente/sets/em-172s-171s-test-for-sony-d50
>
> Marco
>
>
> --- In "meta7777" <anderslangstrand@> w=
rote:
> >
> > Hi Marco!
> > I haven=EF=BF=BDt really tried them. Love the 172=EF=BF=BDs though. Are=
you happy with the 171=EF=BF=BDs?
> > -A
> >
> > --- In m.pesente@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In umashankar <umashanks@> wrot=
e:
> > > >
> > > > tsb 120s are excellent, they are 12 mm diameter and it is easy to s=
older a shielded cable and seal off the end. the ones I was talking about a=
re half that size at 6 mm, more difficult to work with, but they are the st=
andard lavalier size. the larger capsules are also quieter.most of the mike=
s I have built use the slightly larger tsb 140 and the much larger tsb 2555=
. I have some recordings of rajasthani folk musicians which I plan to post =
on soundcloud. (the experiment includes a transformer front end for the Zoo=
m H2, but that is another story. I will let you know.
> > > > =EF=BF=BD
> > > > umashankar
> > >
> > >
> > > On the Unidirectional capsule, what do you think about Primo EM171 ?
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Marco Pesente
> > >
> >
>
|