naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: DIY cardioid lavalier

Subject: Re: DIY cardioid lavalier
From: m_pesente
Date: Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:55 pm ((PST))
Here an old comparison EM172/171 clock test I made some months ago.
https://soundcloud.com/#marco-pesente/sets/em-172s-171s-test-for-sony-d50

Marco


--- In  "meta7777" <> =
wrote:
>
> Hi Marco!
> I haven=B4t really tried them. Love the 172=B4s though. Are you happy wit=
h the 171=B4s?
> -A
>
> --- In  m.pesente@ wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In  umashankar <umashanks@> wrote:
> > >
> > > tsb 120s are excellent, they are 12 mm diameter and it is easy to sol=
der a shielded cable and seal off the end. the ones I was talking about are=
 half that size at 6 mm, more difficult to work with, but they are the stan=
dard lavalier size. the larger capsules are also quieter.most of the mikes =
I have built use the slightly larger tsb 140 and the much larger tsb 2555. =
I have some recordings of rajasthani folk musicians which I plan to post on=
 soundcloud. (the experiment includes a transformer front end for the Zoom =
H2, but that is another story. I will let you know.
> > > =A0
> > > umashankar
> >
> >
> > On the Unidirectional capsule, what do you think about Primo EM171 ?
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Marco Pesente
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU