9. Re: Impressed!

naturerecordists

9. Re: Impressed!

Subject:	9. Re: Impressed!
From:	"sounds.images" sounds.images
Date:	Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:32 am ((PST))

Thanks for the reply Vicki I guess the SASS looks bulky but maybe not as he=
avy as I imagine.

--- In  vickipowys <> wrote:
>
>
> On 26/02/2013, at 7:57 PM, sounds.images wrote:
>
> > Loved the comparison file Vicki, Both are lovely clear and clean
> > recordings, the SSM also looks easier to transport if walking any
> > distance, would you agree with that?
>
> Simon,
>
> Both rigs weigh the same and both are equally easy to carry when
> walking.
>
> Vicki
>
>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
9. Re: Impressed!, sounds.images <=

Previous by Date:	8. Re: Impressed!, vickipowys
Next by Date:	1. Re: iRig pre, maxcatterwell@btinternet.com
Previous by Thread:	8. Re: Impressed!, vickipowys
Next by Thread:	Infrasound and ultrasound, Avocet
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU