| Subject: | Re: ME66 Vs. MKH? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Raimund" animalsounds |
| Date: | Mon Feb 4, 2013 6:52 am ((PST)) |
"Jerry Berrier" wrote: > I just read on a Cornell University page that the K6 module and ME mics from > Sennheiser are Dynamic. > > http://macaulaylibrary.org/field-recording#audio-techniques > > > > That's incorrect, right? I thought they were condenser mics. Right, the K6/ME6x series models come with electret (condenser) microphone elements, whereas the MKH series employs RF-based condenser elements. Regards, Raimund |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ME66 Vs. MKH?, Jerry Berrier |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TASCAM DR-100 MK2 & SONY MDR-7506 Phones, shooze53 |
| Previous by Thread: | ME66 Vs. MKH?, Jerry Berrier |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ME66 Vs. MKH?, Avocet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU