Moreover, the model LS3-LS7 is not so far from the performance of the LS-12.
It's true, LS3-LS7 lacks the LINE IN, however it has on its side the
Lilliputian dimensions and the presence of a third microphone which is also
found in LS-14.
May two decibels of difference justify the purchase of a LS-12 as opposed to a
LS3-LS7?
Great dilemma for tonight...:-(
Marco
--- In wrote:
>
>
>
> Raimund, thanks for the quick and timely mini review of this long-awaited
> LS12!
> At this point, I think the only reason to buy a LS 12 is just the
> Pre-Recording function, otherwise a LS5 or LS11 would be the best solution,
> at least for Europeans.
> Unlike the LS12, LS14 is equipped with an omni central microphone that can be
> the difference recording with the internal microphone...
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
>
>
> --- In "Raimund" wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I finally received the Olympus LS-12 and measured an EIN of -120 dBu(A),
> > which is 2 dB worse than the LS-5/10/11.
> >
> > I agree that its built quality and the general impression is a step back
> > compared to the previous series.
> >
> > As someone who needs glasses I also find that the thin font type on the
> > menu is quite difficult to read (the display on the old model has a better
> > contrast and its font type is bold).
> >
> > I also noticed that they dropped the PCM Rec Format option 44.1kHz/24bit
> > (the 24 bit resolution is now only available at 88.1 and 96.0 kHz).
> >
> > However, considering its lower price (159 Euros) and some additional
> > features, such as the Pre-Recording, I think it is still a good value for
> > the money.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raimund
> >
>
|