Max wrote:
> OK, this isn't the review I was referring to, but it does remind me of wh=
ich aspect of this recorder would drive me mad. If you scroll down to the s=
ection on how it performs, then the second paragraph, you find what I mean.=
What a parlava! What I particularly like about my LS-10 is that I can pres=
s the Pause button to confirm levels then Record and I'm away. I don't have=
to select a folder or go through any of the other totally ridiculous routi=
ne. Bear in mind this is only MY opinion, and is not meant as anything else=
.
http://www.gizmag.com/olympus-ls100-multi-track-linear-pcm-recorder/24397/
---
It seems to me that the description in the Gizmag review mirrors exactly wh=
at one has to do with the LS-10. You select a folder, press Rec once to go =
into record-pause mode to set your levels, then press Rec a second time to =
initiate recording.
Of course, if you always record in the same folder the first step is omitte=
d in practice. I assume the same is true on the LS-100; the reviewer was si=
mply being thorough.
Most of the extra features of the LS-100 (multi-track editing, chromatic tu=
ner, metronome, etc.) are designed for musicians. I also think the unit is =
butt ugly. However, it does have XLR and phantom power but I am not sure wh=
at current is provided or how this compares to other recorders.
-- Robin Parmar
|