naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

5. Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks

Subject: 5. Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks
From: "John Crockett" naturalcontemplative
Date: Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:45 am ((PST))
Thank you for that clarification. I have wondered whether that was correct =
usage. The Rane sheet uses the term "Output Noise."

But it is convenient (for me at least) to use one term so as not to have ye=
t another one rattling around in my poor, often befuddled, brain, and as a =
reminder of which numbers to compare. I think that is the origin of my misu=
se of the term.

John

--- In  Dan Dugan <> wrote:
>
> > In an attempt to make my calculations a little clearer and more useful,=
 I made some changes to the spreadsheet.
>
> This is very useful, John, thank you.
>
> I quibble with the use of one term. "EIN" refers to the "equivalent input=
 noise" of the preamp. Therefore it should not be used for the noise contri=
buted by the microphone. I don't think there's a standard term for the outp=
ut level of the mic's self-noise, ordinarily quoted in terms of equivalent =
SPL. It's a useful figure, though, and perhaps we should invent a term for =
it. Self-noise output?
>
> Missing from your calculations is the loading effect of the input impedan=
ce of the preamp on the output impedance of the mic. Either or both may not=
 be flat in the frequency domain. Let's not go there for now!
>
> -Dan
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU