naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

2. Re: What is a good nature sound recording?

Subject: 2. Re: What is a good nature sound recording?
From: "grummyaa" grummyaa
Date: Mon Nov 5, 2012 6:54 am ((PST))
I know I'm the odd man out, but words on a page will never come even close =
emotionally for me to what sound is capable of. Especially if you consider =
my fianc=E9 is a writer. I understand how important the written word is, no=
t dissing it at all. That's what I'm using right now, but for me it just do=
esn't do it. I have yet to have a piece of writing bring me to tears the wa=
y a piece of music or beautiful recording is capable of. I fully understand=
 that I'm the opposite of the norm there though. I find the written word pr=
etty useful when I'm learning how to use something. I appreciate poetry and=
 artistic use of language but to me the same words can have different meani=
ng or feeling based on how it is read. For example the same lyrics sung fro=
m different performers can either be moving or make me skip to the next tra=
ck.

Not knowing what a bunting sounds like (perhaps I'd recognize if I heard), =
saying it sounds like "drops of water in sunlight" is a beautiful poetic im=
age, but after reading that phrase I still don't have a clue what it sounds=
 like my self. It is nice to know that whatever it sounds like is very beau=
tiful to Mr. Hudson. There is value in that knowledge in that now I'd like =
to hear for myself what was he found so moving. As I would like to experien=
ce it also. But as far as actually sharing with me what a bunting sounds li=
ke I'm no closer to it. I got a better description of the potential surroun=
dings of where he might have heard the bunting than the actual sound it's s=
elf. That said, if I heard a close recording of one in a treated studio or =
chamber I may enjoy his description more than what I hear in a dry close re=
cording of the animal. For me his poetic image reminds me of how lovely sou=
nd sights and smells can be in nature. But in order to share with me that p=
articular sound of the bunting in it's natural habitat he would need to sta=
rt getting more scientific and specific with his wording and less poetic. T=
hen it becomes informative to the sound of the bird but also starts to feel=
 more cold and analytical.  where as an nice audio recording could do it al=
l. It could be incredibly detailed yet magnificently poetic and beautiful.=


Don't mean to step on toes or insult anyone. I'm pretty sure this is a flaw=
 in myself. My fianc=E9 and many others I love and respect are fully entert=
ained by writing and books. They just don't seem to cut it for me. I honest=
ly wish they could, but they can't take me FULLY to another time and space =
to the same degree sound can. I love what sound can do for me. I only wish =
words on a page could do as much, perhaps I should read more and try harder=
 but I honestly would rather listen record and play.




--- In  umashankar <> wrote:
>
> the last fifteen years, when I teach students sound recording, I tell the=
m sound recording was not invented 100 or 120 years ago. writing is the ear=
liest form of sound recording. it records only a small range of the sounds =
we hear, but it is the most important (or meaningful)
> =A0
> umashankar
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Tony Whitehead <>
> >To: 
> >Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 12:02 PM
> >Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] What is a good nature sound recording?
> >
> >Yes ... and I enjoy sound recording ...
> >
> >... but sounds can be shared just as well through words. A good recordin=
g
> >does't have to be audio?
> >
> >Here for example is W H Hudson's 1900 recording of a corn bunting singin=
g
> >(in "Nature in Downland")
> >
> >"The common bunting's little outburst of confused or splintered notes, i=
s
> >when heard (by me) at the same time mentally seen as a handful of clear
> >water thrown up and breaking into sparkling drops in the sunlight."
> >
> >just a thought
> >
> >Tony
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Klas Strandberg <> wrote:
> >
> >> **
> >>
> >>
> >> Isn't that wonderful, Tony?
> >> And, may I add, with the same headphones being able to hear it again,
> >> years later? And for others to share?
> >>
> >> Thanks Bernie.
> >> I needed that. (Even if it can be one of those wonderful American
> >> ironies which I never will understand, before it's too late...:-))
> >>
> >> Klas.
> >>
> >>
> >> -04, you wrote:
> >> >I sometimes wonder if the reason I record is to give me a reason to
> >> listen.
> >> >
> >> >I know I shouldn't need a reason but, for example, today I recorded t=
he
> >> >quiet interior of a rural English church.
> >> >
> >> >As I let the recording progress inside, I sat outside and simply list=
ened.
> >> >I heard the blackbird's evening chorus. I heard redwings and fieldfar=
e
> >> >overhead, fresh in from the east. I heard the distant rumble of main =
road
> >> >linking Exeter to Plymouth. I heard dogs bark and footsteps. Cows, cr=
ows
> >> >and jays. I listened as the breeze picked up and moved slender baldes=
 of
> >> >grass between gravestones. And the rustle of leaves and the rain on m=
y
> >> >jacket. And dusk spread.
> >> >
> >> >It almost doesn't matter what I recorded (30 mins of near silence) ..=
. it
> >> >was a good recording for me.
> >> >
> >> >Tony
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Bernie Krause <
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > **
> >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Hear! Hear!, Klas. Great observation.
> >> > >
> >> > > Bernie
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Nov 3, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Klas Strandberg wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Dan, Bernie and all
> >> > > >
> >> > > > For 40 years I have been promoting the use of parabols, well awa=
re of
> >> > > > that parabols twist "reality" and create illusions. I have been
> >> > > > fighting a war against "purists", telling me what a terrible per=
son
> >> > > > I was.
> >> > > > But "we" won that war, Dan, Bernie and all. And myself. It ended=
 20
> >> > > > years ago.
> >> > > > Today I hear no voices at all, not anywhere, being "purist" abou=
t
> >> > > > flat frequency curves or non-editing or anything like it.
> >> > > > "Every recording is an illusion".
> >> > > > Yeah? Who claims differently nowadays? Where is this massive glo=
bal
> >> > > > commercial sound production industry, aiming for "purity" and
> >> > > > forbidding us poor nature sound recordists to switch a filter "o=
n"?
> >> > > > I don't see the threat.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I do see, however, a need for "quality" discussions.
> >> > > > I like words like "sonels" and "splashing," because such words g=
ive
> >> > > > us ways to describe the quality of a recording. I would like a l=
ong
> >> > > > list of such new words together with sound examples.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Why is that considered so wrong?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Klas.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > At 16:59 2012-11-03, you wrote:
> >> > > >>> If all the above sounds like "manipulation", that started with=
 the
> >> > > >>> choice, placement and aiming of mics, recording level, and
> >> decinding
> >> > > >>> when to push the record button.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Ansel Adams made a lot of adjustments in his negatives when he
> >> > > >> printed them.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>> I've got weeks of rubbish recordings, but the ones that go out=
 are
> >> > > >>> those which, to my mind, represent the wildlife in this area. =
It is
> >> > > >>> the end result which matters.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> It's an art of illusion.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>> BTW I've just put a stereo file on Soundcloud asking what is w=
rong
> >> > > >>> with it:
> >> > > >>> http://soundcloud.com/stowford/wren-and-stream-stereo-check
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Out of phase?
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -Dan
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> ------------------------------------
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> >> > > >> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bern=
ie
> >> > > >> Krause.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > > Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
> >> > > > S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
> >> > > > Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
> >> > > > email: 
> >> > > > website: www.telinga.com
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ------------------------------------
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> >> > > > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Berni=
e
> >> > > > Krause.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Wild Sanctuary
> >> > > POB 536
> >> > > Glen Ellen, CA 95442
> >> > > 707-996-6677
> >> > > http://www.wildsanctuary.com/
> >> > > 
> >> > > Google Earth zooms: http://earth.wildsanctuary.com/
> >> > > SKYPE: biophony
> >> > > FaceBook:
> >> > > http://www.facebook.com/TheGreatAnimalOrchestra
> >> > > http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
> >> > > Twitter:
> >> > > http://www.twitter.com/berniekrause
> >> > > YouTube:
> >> > > https://www.youtube.com/BernieKrauseTV
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> >"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> >> >sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Kra=
use.
> >> >
> >> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
> >> S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
> >> Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
> >> email: 
> >> website: www.telinga.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>=A0
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------
> >
> >"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> >sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause=
.
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU