naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: artifact in spectrogram analysis

Subject: Re: artifact in spectrogram analysis
From: "Avocet" madl74
Date: Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:05 am ((PDT))
> Fortunately even cheap A/D converters nowadays are very good.
> ...
> Nothing to do with data compression. Losses in the process? Way
> below imperceptible.

Agreed. Across all the bits, linearity can't be maintained, but over
six or
eight bits, it is good enough. For instance, a 100% error in the sixth
bit equates to about 3% distortion and it is always better than that.

Having experimented with ADC's, it is difficult to get rid of
crosstalk from the digital circuits back into the analogue input. This
is where cheaper ADC's tend to fall down, but "dither" is added to the
last three bits, ostensibly to prevent quantisation noise, but I
suspect it is there whether you want it or not. :-) Dither "averages
out" the quantisation noise of the least bits through "stochastic
resonance", which even Wiki apologises over. (Yes, I did have to look
it up) :-)

I haven't looked at 24 bit recordings on my affordable Tascams, but I
suspect that the least bits are noisy. For a start, no analogue input
is likely to have a signal to noise ratio of 138dB if only because
that takes it beyond thermal noise.

BTW if you want to hear quantisation noise, listen to an 8 bit digital
signal. It sounds like a kazoo.

David

David Brinicombe
North Devon, UK
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU