Subject: | 3. Re: artifact in spectrogram created using Raven |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:15 am ((PDT)) |
> Dan, what bit rate would you consider acceptable for mp3 recording? I did a blind listening test at an NSS Workshop, and 256K bits/sec was indi= stinguishable from the original on a dawn chorus. Pushing lower rates depen= ds on the material and that requires trial and error. There's an expensive = plug-in available now, Sonnox/Fraunhofer Pro Codec, that lets you monitor i= n real time switching between original and various codecs and data rates. W= ould be great for setting up a web site with audio, you could encode differ= ent clips at different rates depending on how they sounded or looked on a s= pectrogram. -Dan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 2. Re: artifact in spectrogram created using Raven, mipartitus |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 4. Re: artifact in spectrogram created using Raven, Mitch Hill |
Previous by Thread: | 3. Re: artifact in spectrogram created using Raven, mipartitus |
Next by Thread: | 3. Re: artifact in spectrogram created using Raven, mipartitus |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU