| Subject: | 1. Re: artifact in spectrogram created using Raven |
|---|---|
| From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
| Date: | Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:11 am ((PDT)) |
<<what bit rate would you consider acceptable for mp3 recording? >> With music recordings for artists' approval I never use less than 160kbs, t= hough for more critical sources such as string quartets I stick to 256kbs, = or uncompressed WAV. I would never use an mp3 of any data rate for any purp= ose other than a quick approval copy, which needs reduced bandwidth to get = through an email server. Scott Fraser |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: A strange noise in Rode Nt-1A and NT-2A, rock_scallop |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2. Re: artifact in spectrogram created using Raven, mipartitus |
| Previous by Thread: | 1. Re: artifact in spectrogram created using Raven, vickipowys |
| Next by Thread: | 1. Re: artifact in spectrogram created using Raven, John Crockett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU