Hi Jonh,
The recording is not with parabora this time, but the gain in the side was =
less that in the mid aprox 25 db less. So it is maybe the cause. I have mad=
e another recording after you have said that the sidewas much lower and the=
se one is with parabola: http://soundcloud.com/freitojos/120627t0600z-santm=
argdaserra
This one is with the gain in the mic preamp the same as I remember but with=
parabola so maybe you could compare the two, the previous ms without parab=
ola and the extra gain in the mid, and these one here same gain and parabol=
a.
I am sory for my poor english!
Regards,
Jos=E9
--- In "hartogj" <> wrote=
:
>
> Hi Jos=E9,
> Now that's solved, yet I have another question about your recording.
> Regarding your ms stereo technique, why is the mid signal so exaggerated =
compared to the side signal? I don't think you mentioned it, but now I wond=
er - were you using a parabolic dish?
>
> John Hartog
> rockscallop.org
>
>
> --- In "freitojos" <josefreitas81@> wro=
te:
> >
> > Ok Raimond,
> > Mistery solved.
> > Regards,
> > Jos=E9
> >
> > --- In "Raimund" <raimundspecht@> wro=
te:
> > >
> > > > Thank you, so it is Luscinia megharhincos only, and there is no fro=
g. You are absolutely shure that the files in xeno-canto you posted are onl=
y the Luscinia megharincos call and no frog in it? The "croak" is in the L=
uscinia repertoir for shure?
> > >
> > > Hi Jos=E9,
> > >
> > > Yes, I'm quite sure that xeno-canto is correct here. I know these ala=
rm calls also from my own experience. Nightingales are very common here in =
Germany, even in the city of Berlin where I live. In spring you can find th=
em singing in almost every park. So, there is really no doubt.
> > >
> > > Even the Wikipedia article on the Nightingale says that "it has a fro=
g-like alarm call". See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightingale
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Raimund
> > >
> >
>
|