Hi Jos=E9,
Now that's solved, yet I have another question about your recording.
Regarding your ms stereo technique, why is the mid signal so exaggerated co=
mpared to the side signal? I don't think you mentioned it, but now I wonder=
- were you using a parabolic dish?
John Hartog
rockscallop.org
--- In "freitojos" <> wr=
ote:
>
> Ok Raimond,
> Mistery solved.
> Regards,
> Jos=E9
>
> --- In "Raimund" <raimundspecht@> wrote=
:
> >
> > > Thank you, so it is Luscinia megharhincos only, and there is no frog.=
You are absolutely shure that the files in xeno-canto you posted are only =
the Luscinia megharincos call and no frog in it? The "croak" is in the Lus=
cinia repertoir for shure?
> >
> > Hi Jos=E9,
> >
> > Yes, I'm quite sure that xeno-canto is correct here. I know these alarm=
calls also from my own experience. Nightingales are very common here in Ge=
rmany, even in the city of Berlin where I live. In spring you can find them=
singing in almost every park. So, there is really no doubt.
> >
> > Even the Wikipedia article on the Nightingale says that "it has a frog-=
like alarm call". See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightingale
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raimund
> >
>
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|