Thanks Jez!
Diane
--- In "Jez" <> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> fyi, Reaper has the best conversion & rendering paths apparently, better =
than audacity & on a par with most (& better than quite a few) of the suite=
s costing hundreds.
>
> minidisc recorders: actually, some of the Sony Hi-Md's are capable of ver=
y good results. They do have fairly quiet inputs.
>
> --- In "DIANE" <cbbmo@> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion Scott...just took a look at it..pretty awesom=
e!
> > Diane
> >
> > --- In Scott Fraser <scottbfraser@> w=
rote:
> > >
> > > <<another poster here has suggested Audacity, which is ok & free, but=
a better option would be Reaper, as this has the ability for you to adjust=
eq & other processing stages while the track is playing rather than the sy=
stem audacity uses which doesn't allow for rolling adjustments. Reaper is a=
low cost licence program ($60 I think) but you can 'review' it for as long=
as you want. >>
> > >
> > > And I'll throw another free contender into the ring, which is PreSonu=
s' Studio One Free. I haven't spent any considerable time with it since I h=
ave a pro DAW for all my serious work, but my sense of it is that it's MUCH=
more user friendly & intuitive than Audacity, which never made much sense =
to me. Coming from the standpoint of having spent the last 12 years in dail=
y heavy use of Digital Performer, I find Studio One is a user experience I =
can readily wrap my head around. And it's free.
> > >
> > > Scott Fraser
> > >
> > >
> >
>
|