Subject: | Re: Boundary Size Test - was Wind in the Willow(s).............. |
---|---|
From: | "Avocet" madl74 |
Date: | Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:40 pm ((PDT)) |
Tom, I think the boundary effect is frequently misunderstood as it has not been adequately explained, and here is not the place. However, the size of the boundary used, whatever the type, will govern the frequency range where it is effective. A clue is the wavelength of sound at 1KHz which is 340mm or around a foot. A related effect is heard with larger diameter omni mics which are never fully omni at high frequencies. The larger the diaphragm diameter, the more directional it will be at mid to high frequencies. While I like to know about the theory of such effects, the real answer is with experimentation. When changing the size of a boundary, listen for the effect at higher and lower frequencies to hear the differences. David David Brinicombe North Devon, UK Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: estonian dawn, Jez |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 1. Re: extreme amplification, Avocet |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Boundary Size Test - was Wind in the Willow(s).............., chrishails50 |
Next by Thread: | hey, John Book |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU