Subject: | Re: Boundary Size Test - was Wind in the Willow(s).............. |
---|---|
From: | "chrishails50" chrishails50 |
Date: | Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:08 pm ((PDT)) |
Works fine now -cheers ! Keep going with the tests ! C --- In "tk7859" <> wrote: > > Hi Chris and Peter > > Sorry about that. Don't know how it happened. > > I have made it public on the web now. Please let me know if you are stil= l having problems. > > Cheers, TomR > > --- In "chrishails50" <cjhails@> wrote: > > > > Tom, I am following your experiments with much interest, but your last = two posts have contained Picasaweb links which give me problems (like the o= ne below) - they say simply "Sorry, that page was not found." Is it just me= being daft ? > > > > Chris > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Boundary Size Test - was Wind in the Willow(s).............., tk7859 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: extreme amplification, Mike Rooke |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Boundary Size Test - was Wind in the Willow(s).............., tk7859 |
Next by Thread: | Re: Boundary Size Test - was Wind in the Willow(s).............., Avocet |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU