naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sound Devices MixPre-D

Subject: Re: Sound Devices MixPre-D
From: "Michael Raphael"
Date: Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:43 am ((PDT))
The new version does not contain the identical analogue stages. It does sou=
nd quite different. The Mix-Pre D also loses the optical limiter that the M=
ix-Pre had. It has a limiter, but it not the same.

On Mar 25, 2012, at 1:34 AM, Ben Cook wrote:

> I haven't used the new version but by all accounts the D retains the orig=
inal version's analogue stages and for all intents and purposes sounds iden=
tical.
>
> --- In  "Jez" <> wrote:
> >
> > just wondered if anyone has compared this (in practical, hands on terms=
) with the older MixPre ? The D seems to have more features but what matter=
s to me is whether it sounds as good as the MixPre did !
> >
> > any thoughts would be welcome.
> >
> > ta.
> >
> > Jez
> >
>
>










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU