i had been planning to bring this to your notice, but i could not remember =
the article's name, or the author. i have, suddenly, and here is the link. =
it is basically for a range of microphones, and inter-microphone angles.
=A0
http://www.rycote.com/images/uploads/The_Stereophonic_Zoom.pdf
=A0
umashankar
i have published my poems. you can read (or buy) at http://stores.lulu.com/=
umashankar
>________________________________
> From: macmang4125 <>
>To:
>Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 1:57 PM
>Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: Stereo from ME66s
>
>I don't know if this is of any interest?
>
>http://fieldpost.blogspot.com/2008_07_01_archive.html
>
>Phil
>
>--- In "Robin" <> wrote:
>>
>> Peter Shute wrote:
>>
>> > I'm interested in the pros and cons of using two ME66s for stereo reco=
rds because I'm in a similar situation to David Darrell-Lambert in that I h=
ave one ME66 and I'd like to make stereo recordings sometimes. I'm finding =
the quality from the ME66 way better than the inbuilt mics of the PCM M10, =
even ignoring the poor stereo separation of the latter.
>> >
>> > I hadn't realised there might be a problem with a non matched second M=
E66. Is it simply a matter of tweaking the volume of one channel to fix thi=
s, or is there more to it?
>>
>> There would be more to it than that, since the actual peaks and dips in =
the frequency response might be different between the mics. But my guess is=
that in this application they'd be close enough.
>>
>> > And are there any workable arrangements
>> > other than crossing them at about 30 degrees?
>>
>> I wouldn't cross them at all, but instead use them in parallel. It might=
serve you well to experiment with Blumlein shuffling and try a baffle betw=
een them. IIRC he used shotguns in some of his experiments, and the process=
ing matrix achieved greater "reach" than with a single microphone. The othe=
r obvious improvement is that with two microphones you are picking up twice=
as much signal.
>>
>> I have been building a plugin for this processing task. Unfortunately it=
's only going to be useful for those with Native Instruments Reaktor. Someh=
ow I doubt that's a common tool for nature recordists!
>>
>> -- robin parmar
>>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
>sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
|