Subject: | 2. Re: New Soundscapes & realism |
---|---|
From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
Date: | Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:59 am ((PST)) |
<<But I like the three simpler categories of NANPA better, how about: Wild - much like the photographers, not modified in any way for the duration of the clip>> We must recognize the artifice in this, too, for quite likely one may have waited for the passing of an aircraft to start recording, one may have aimed directional mics away from a highway, or simply walked 50 meters further into a forest to avoid a distant village. Even in the most ideologically pure setting there is editorial decision making. I wouldn't get too wrapped up in striving to be 100% free of any compromises in this endeavor, & I also wouldn't stress about defining 'good' or 'bad' human sounds. Those values are subjective, artificial, & dependent on context. Scott Fraser |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 1. Re: New Soundscapes & realism, Danny McCarty |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Nature Sounds Society Post Production Workshop Feb 3-5, 2012, John Brenneman |
Previous by Thread: | 1. Re: New Soundscapes & realism, Danny McCarty |
Next by Thread: | 2. Re: New Soundscapes & realism, hartogj |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU