Hi Volker and Jos=E9,
Thanks for your thoughts. As I mentioned in my first post, I find the
dichotomy between man and nature oversimplified. Kant's sublime is
anthropocentric and works within this dichotomy. While some might feel it
explains the way they feel, I'm not comfortable with it.
Personally, nature recording isn't* just* about aesthetics, some recordings
can be open to many readings I think, for me, the politics of space is
mostly always present, this is touched upon by others in the soundscapes
and realism discussion.
Best,
Louie.
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|