Subject: | Re: Mic test please comment |
---|---|
From: | "Jose Freitas" = |
cketmail.com Date: Sun Jun 5, 2011 8:11 am ((PDT)) Hello Dadiv, For me the rig one is better. Some mic self noise, but the sounds were more= acuteate and the stereo better. Jos=E9 --- In "Avocet" <> wrote: > > I've just put a test of two very different mic rigs on my page: > http://www.stowford.org/recordings.htm > > These were recorded simultaneously and I've also done a stereo test by > shaking peanuts as I walk past to show the different stereo image > patterns. > > All comments will be appreciated, especially critical ones - after all > it is a test. :-) > > David > > David Brinicombe > North Devon, UK > Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Mic test please comment, Avocet |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Mic test please comment, Mike Rooke |
Previous by Thread: | Mic test please comment, Avocet |
Next by Thread: | Re: Mic test please comment, Mike Rooke |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU