Subject: | Re: Amplitude and frequency attenuation vs. distance |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund" animalsounds |
Date: | Tue May 24, 2011 12:44 am ((PDT)) |
> Note that at bat echolocation frequencies the excess attenuation is > around 1dB per metre, and many bat experts forget how limited bat > echolocation is, commonly 15 metre max. (120dB SPL at 100mm; -50 at > 30met total echo path length; absorption -30dB =3D 40dB SPL less > reflection coefficient. For small targets the inverse square law > become the inverse quad law. > > Lesser horseshoe bats (110KHz)are difficult to pick up at over 5 > metres as I have confirmed at bat emergence counts. Hi David, Yes, the atmospheric attenuation of ultrasounds can be huge. Another problem in detecting bats is that their sonar beam is often quite d= irectional (http://www.pnas.org/content/107/31/13930.full.pdf). Also, the sensitivity of most bat detectors is relatively poor at frequenci= es above about 80 kHz. Regards, Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Amplitude and frequency attenuation vs. distance, lecarmo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Crown SASS-P MKII, davida713 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Amplitude and frequency attenuation vs. distance, lecarmo |
Next by Thread: | DIY 1/8 input stereo mic...wiring question., Paul Willison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU