naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Amplitude and frequency attenuation vs. distance

Subject: Re: Amplitude and frequency attenuation vs. distance
From: "Raimund" animalsounds
Date: Mon May 23, 2011 1:02 pm ((PDT))
<We are often reminded that sound attenuation with distance approximates a =
reduction of 6dB for each doubling of distance. However, as you and Klas po=
int out, the actual attenuation over distance is highly frequency dependent=
. This suggests the 6db rule would only be accurate at one specific frequen=
cy ...>

The 6 dB rule is the theoretic attenuation casued by the geometric spreadin=
g (divergence), which itself does not depend on the frequency.

<... and any general rule would need to include an approximate adjustment f=
or frequency. Does that make any sense,if so do you know of a common use eq=
uation that includes a frequency adjustment?>

Yes, there is an additional atmospheric attenuation that depends on the fre=
quency but also on thje temperature, pressure and humidity. The underlying =
equation is quite complicated, but there are websites that can estimate the=
 effect:

http://resource.npl.co.uk/acoustics/techguides/absorption

In addition to that, there are a number of other mechanisms (such as reflec=
tion, diffraction, refraction) that can also influence propagation of sound=
. See http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Atmospheric+Acoustics

Regards,
Raimund








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU