Subject: | Re: Audio Technica AT4022 or Sennheiser MKH 20 |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:31 am ((PDT)) |
>> I use 2 Audio Technica AT4022's for my nature recording and would like to >> know if it's really worth the $900 each for the upgrade to the Sennheiser >> MKH20's? I usually record in a boundary array but also like to record hand >> holding them in a pistol grip. The AT4022 really exhibit low self noise. > > I have six 3032s (predecessor to the 4022) and I have had occasional problems > with popping or fizzing when they are out overnight. It's an individual mic > thing--the majority of them have never made noises. Though the capsules' > threads were glued, they can be removed, though I did cosmetic damage to two > that had more glue. Replacement/spare capsules for 3032 are $70, I think. > > I have tested mine by putting them in the refrigerator while monitoring them. > That will cause condensation and stimulate the problem if the mic has it. I forgot to conclude: The Sennheisers will be more reliable. The quality difference may not be significant. -Dan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Telinga Pro 5 W for sale (NL) - Richard Folwell is interested, Richard Folwell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Audio Technica AT4022 or Sennheiser MKH 20, Paul Jacobson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Audio Technica AT4022 or Sennheiser MKH 20, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Audio Technica AT4022 or Sennheiser MKH 20, Paul Jacobson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU