naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Trans Noise - Support Needed!!

Subject: Re: Trans Noise - Support Needed!!
From: "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999
Date: Wed Mar 16, 2011 3:59 pm ((PDT))
There is some good terminology in the National Park Service's Soundscape Pl=
an and Environmental Assessment for Zion National Park, page 25:

"deviation from natural ambient can be used to identify reductions in liste=
ning area and alerting distance. Reduction in listening area quantifies the=
 loss of hearing ability to humans and animals as a result of an increase i=
n ambient noise level. Under natural ambient conditions a sound is audible =
within a certain area around a visitor or animal. If the ambient level is i=
ncreased due to a noise event, the area in which the sound is audible decre=
ases."

and on p. 26:

For example, under natural ambient conditions, an owl perched in a tree may=
 be able to hear a mouse scurrying through the brush anywhere within an are=
a of 100-square-meters of the perch. If a noise event increases the ambient=
 level by 3 decibels (dBA), the area in which the owl can hear a mouse woul=
d decrease by 50 percent to approximately 50-square-meters.
Reduction in alerting distance is closely related to reduction in listening=
 area. The residual alerting distance is equal to the square root of the re=
sidual listening area. Instead of addressing losses in terms of an area, re=
duction in alerting distance expresses the reduction as a linear distance f=
rom a source. For example, under natural ambient conditions, a canyoneer ma=
y be alerted to the sound of a flash flood at a distance of 1-mile. If a no=
ise such as an aircraft overflight increases the ambient level by 6 dBA, th=
e distance at which the flood could be detected would decrease by 50 percen=
t to approximately 1=E2=81=842-mile or 2,640-feet.
Visitors and wildlife are impacted by their failure to hear natural sounds =
that would have been audible in the absence of noise: a bird misses the sou=
nd of a worm, a mouse misses the footfall of a coyote, a visitor misses the=
 sound of a distant waterfall. Reductions in listening area and alerting di=
stance capture these types of impacts.

BTW the geometry is incorrect in Fig. 4 on p. 26.

-Dan





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU