Thanks, Tero. This is about what I'm looking to do with the coatis, so thi=
s set up may be the way to go. Did you use pre-amps for your recordings?
Chris
--- In Tero Linjama <> wro=
te:
>
> Here is my recordings for bats. Text is in finnish. Look at spectrograms =
and you
> see sounds 30 to 50 kHz. These are taken to Tascam HD-P2 (sample rate 192=
kHz)
> and Sennheiser MKH microphones.
> http://www.surfbirds.com/blog/soundsfromnature/11681/Lepakoiden+%C3%A4%C3=
%A4nist%C3%A4.html
>
>
> Sound sample http://www.ksly.net/temp/lepakot.mp3
>
> ****
>
>
> Tero Linjama
> Sounds from Nature
> Tellervonkatu 15 B 3
> 40200 Jyv=C3=83=C2=A4skyl=C3=83=C2=A4
> +358 (0)50 401 0824
>
> www.soundsfromnature.com
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Christine Hass <>
> To:
> Sent: Mon, September 6, 2010 8:08:08 AM
> Subject: [Nature Recordists] High frequency recording
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm a biologist interested in obtaining sound recordings of a social
> carnivore, the white-nosed coati. These raccoon relatives live in the
> tropical and subtropical forested regions, and live in family groups of u=
p
> to 40 (or more) animals. The are quite vocal, and emit a variety of grun=
ts,
> chirps, and squeals. Very little analysis has been done on their
> vocalizations, and all of that in zoos where they don't vocalize much. W=
hat
> has been discovered is that their vocalizations range from 5 kHz to 55 kH=
z,
> posing difficulties for field recording.
>
> I'm new to sound recording, but have been trying to figure out the best (=
and
> most affordable) way to record and analyze these sounds. I need lightwei=
ght
> but durable equipment, as I may have to hike in long distances to get to =
the
> groups. I spent some time perusing the old messages on this listserv, wh=
ich
> was very helpful. It sounds like I might be able to get away with a
> recorder such as the Korg MR-2 or Tascam DR-680. The messages regarding =
the
> higher range recordings from the "standard" mics, such as the Sennheiser
> MKH20 were particularly interesting, as I thought I might have to hunt do=
wn
> a wideband mic to cover 1-100 kHz. But I don't want to plop down > $1000
> for a mic to discover it didn't quite cover the range I need. This is a=
ll
> for analytic purposes, not for producing professional sound recordings, i=
f
> that makes any difference.
>
> I'm looking for suggestions, primarily for mics that will cover the
> necessary range and still be affordable (under $2k, preferable under $1k)=
,
> but I also welcome any other suggestions regarding equipment and techniqu=
es.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
> Vail, AZ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|