naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Surround Sound / Wildlife Recordings

Subject: Re: Surround Sound / Wildlife Recordings
From: "Marinos Koutsomichalis" marinoskouts=
omichalis
Date: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:10 am ((PDT))

There are also the soundfield ambisonics microphones - I' ve work with them=
 outdoors but always not in extreme conditions. I' m quite happy with their=
 sound !

I read somewhere though that Chris recently used one in his trip to antarct=
ica..

m



On 26 =CE=91=CF=85=CE=B3 2010, at 5:51 =CE=BC.=CE=BC., Bernie Krause wrote:

> Four 4060s aligned in a tetrahedral pattern will provide the basis for
> ambisonic surround that can be delivered by anything from 3 to over
> 150 channels. And, yes, the surround provided by an MKH 30 and two 40s
> facing opposite directions (used by Martyn, Chris Watson, and a few
> others) provides a wonderful double MS result that can likewise be re-
> programmed in an ambisonic configuration. The beauty of the double MS
> configuration is that only three channels are needed.
>
> Bernie
>
> On Aug 26, 2010, at 6:48 AM, Martyn Stewart wrote:
>
> > I actually had a chance to use the DPA surround setup on a project
> > and was very impressed with them. I'm told they are the same
> > capsules as the 4060's. I use normally 2 MKH 40 back to back with 1
> > MKH-30 effectively.
> >
> > Martyn
> >
> > Martyn Stewart
> > .........................................
> > www.naturesound.org
> > www.soundofcritters.com
> > .........................................
> > 425-898-0462
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On Aug 26, 2010, at 6:19 AM, clay <> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:29 AM, corticalsongs <=
m
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Any thoughts on using surround sound for wildlife? Are the mic
> >>>> specs
> >>> suited to wildlife?
> >>>
> >>> I would say that all you need is 4 mics to start. As far as I can
> >>> tell the
> >>> fancy surround mics are all pretty noisy right now, perhaps thier
> >>> intended
> >>> use was the concert hall or foley stage. If you are recording a
> >>> jungle at
> >>> night, they would be fine, but as Dan pointed out, they are
> >>> probably too
> >>> noisy for most quiet places in North America.
> >>>
> >>> David
> >>>
> >>> __._,_.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> I was thinking three mics would work, if one were Figure-8, plus
> >> front and
> >> rear facing cardiods?
> >>
> >>
> >> There is something called a Tetramic that might be useful, but still
> >> relatively noisy.
> >>
> >> http://www.core-sound.com/TetraMic/1.php
> >>
> >> clay
> >>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> > Krause
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Wild Sanctuary
> POB 536
> Glen Ellen, CA 95442
> 707-996-6677
> http://www.wildsanctuary.com
> 
> Google Earth zooms: http://earth.wildsanctuary.com
> SKYPE: biophony
>
>










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU